Designed not only to be light and compact, the RF24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM is also a very versatile lens that even have macro function and would not weigh you down as you shoot. Priced reasonably for those moving into full-frame mirrorless to expand their creative possibilities. Filter Size: 67mm; Image Stabilisation of up to 5 stops

And the RF 24-105 (not L, again) Again, reviewing the samples out there, I'm seeing the same theme as the EF-M 15-45 vs RF-S 18-45, the RF 24-50 may be operationally less capable (can't hit 105mm), but in terms of optical performance, it's superior delivering better metrics within the focal range it has.
Sample images from the upcoming Sigma 24-105 f/4L DG OS Art lens have appeared over at lenstip.com. The sample images look good to me and the $899 price tag for the lens more than justified. View sample images here | Preorder: Sigma 24-105 f/4 OS at B&H Photo
Thoroughly-rendered image quality, all the way to the edges. Featuring a constant aperture of f/4 throughout its entire zoom range, the RF24-105mm f/4L IS USM is a standard zoom lens that provides the versatility to handle different scenes. Compared to the EF-mount version ( EF24-105mm f/4L IS II USM ), it is 95g lighter and has a stronger First thought it could be because of DoF or some back/front focusing. But actually all samples are same and nothing is much sharper. Spend some time over Canon RF lens sharpness and compared with 24-70/f2.8 , 24-105/f4 and Panasonic 25-50/f1.7. From DPR galleries. Sad but f2/f2.8 are not very sharp compared to 24-105/f4 or Panny f1.7 wide open!
RF 16 f2.8, RF24 f1.8, RF 35 1.8, RF 50 1.8 RF 85 f2, RF 600 f11 & RF800 f11 primes RF 15-30, 24-105, 24-240, 100-400. Of course one can also find all sorts of deals on new and used EF lenses that work just fine on RF mount cameras with Canon adaptor. It simply is not true that Canon only offers expensive RF lenses.
it is a good range ,but i always prefered a 2 lens set up either 24-70 f2.8 and 70-200mm f2.8 or a 20-70mm f4 and 70-200mm f4 , 24-105mm with a 135mm f1.8 could be useful also ,if going for a one lens option then it has to 24 -200 or 28 to 200mm for me but i am sure many will like the flexibility of the 24-105 and f2.8 is the icing .
BRuFW97.
  • pfr5xhsw5c.pages.dev/27
  • pfr5xhsw5c.pages.dev/256
  • pfr5xhsw5c.pages.dev/218
  • pfr5xhsw5c.pages.dev/262
  • pfr5xhsw5c.pages.dev/142
  • pfr5xhsw5c.pages.dev/112
  • pfr5xhsw5c.pages.dev/226
  • pfr5xhsw5c.pages.dev/372
  • pfr5xhsw5c.pages.dev/172

    • canon rf 24 105 f4 sample images